Free Resource
Precise Trade Entries Pros Use to Avoid Getting Stopped Out (2026)
If you’ve ever placed a pending order, watched price rush into your level, tap your stop like it had a personal issue with you, then rocket in your direction… welcome. You’re not “unlucky.” You’re just placing your entry where liquidity lives.
This post is about fixing that.
Not with 14 indicators. Not with “signal groups.” Just a cleaner entry process that puts your stop in a safer place and makes your entry less… donated to the market.
Quick heads-up: this is trading education, not financial advice. You can lose money. A lot of it. That’s the game.
The real problem with pending orders
Pending orders have one big weakness:
You commit to a level before the market shows you it actually wants to react there.
And when price is moving hard into your zone (strong momentum candles, heavy pressure), you feel it in your stomach:
“This is gonna spike through, tag my stop, and then reverse.”
That feeling isn’t paranoia. It’s often correct.
Because the market doesn’t need your level. It needs the liquidity around it.
The idea you need to accept (or keep donating stops)
Nothing “random” happens around key levels.
Where retail sees:
- support/resistance
- “clean order block”
- double top/bottom
- equal highs/lows
- daily high/low break
…institutions often see:
- a pile of stops
- a pool of orders
- a place to fill size
Price moves from consumed liquidity to unconsumed liquidity. It goes where the orders are.
So when you place your entry right on the obvious level, you are often placing it inside the target zone, not the safe zone.
Quick view: the entry roadmap
Here’s the table version you asked for. The “quick view” people can scan in 5 seconds.
| Step | What I’m Checking | What I’m Waiting For | What I Do |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Direction / bias | Clear swing leg + pullback | Decide long/short only |
| 2 | Premium/discount (50% concept) | Price in “better price” area | Only hunt entries above/below 50% depending on bias |
| 3 | Best level type | FVG present or not | If FVG exists, it’s priority |
| 4 | Confirmation | Structure shift (micro CHoCH) | No shift = no trade |
| 5 | Extra confirmation (only if no FVG) | Volume + candle body pressure | If both confirm, enter on retest |
| 6 | Stop placement | Logical invalidation | Behind FVG or behind the swing/POI |
| 7 | Target | External liquidity | Previous high/low, equal highs/lows, daily levels |
The “shortcode” version (scan this, then read details)
Entry Shortcode: “POI → Shift → Confirm → Execute”
- Mark POI (FVG / breaker / OB / equal highs-lows area)
- Wait for structure shift on lower timeframe (micro trend breaks)
- Confirm
- If FVG exists: shift is enough
- If no FVG: shift + volume + pressure candle
- Enter on retest / next valid trigger
- Stop behind the thing that should not break
- Target external liquidity (where stops sit)
Simple. Not easy. But simple.
The levels that trap you the most (so you can stop being the liquidity)
These are the most common “I got stopped out then it went my way” zones:
- Swing highs & swing lows
Where everyone puts their stop. Convenient. - Equal highs / equal lows
Even more stops. Even more convenient. - Round numbers
Humans love them. Markets love punishing obviousness. - Daily high / daily low / session highs
Breakout traders pile in. Stops pile in. You can guess the rest.
The market often “clears” these zones first, then moves.
How I choose the entry method (with FVG vs without FVG)
This is the main logic from your transcript, written like a real person.
Case 1: If there’s an FVG in the premium/discount zone
FVG is priority because price often reacts fast there. If you wait for too many “perfect” confirmations, the move is gone.
What I do:
- Mark the FVG that sits in the right area (premium for shorts, discount for longs).
- Wait for a structure shift on the lower timeframe after price taps the zone.
- Enter with stop behind the FVG (not inside it).
That’s it.
I’m not hunting the world’s smallest stop here. I’m hunting a clean, survivable entry.
Case 2: No FVG in the area
Now I want extra confirmation because the zone is less “mechanical.”
So I require 3 things:
- Structure shift (micro trend breaks)
- Volume confirmation (break candle shows meaningful participation)
- Candle pressure (body shows intent, not a weak doji/pin nonsense)
Then:
- I wait for price to retest the break area
- I enter with stop behind a clean invalidation point (usually the most recent swing created during the shift)
What “structure shift” means in normal language
You don’t need fancy terms.
If price was making:
- higher highs and higher lows (mini uptrend)
And then it breaks a key low and fails to reclaim it… that’s a shift.
Or price creates a new swing high, then breaks the last swing low that supported the move.
You’re basically asking:
“Did the market’s short-term behavior change after touching my level?”
If yes: I’m interested.
If not: I’m not paying for hope.
Volume: how I actually use it (without pretending it’s magic)
Volume is not a crystal ball. It’s a clue.
When I’m in the “no FVG” situation, I want the break to show actual participation:
- break candle volume higher than recent candles
- not just a random wick through
Then I want the retest candle to look like pressure:
- solid body
- closes with intent (not dead in the middle)
If volume is weak and the candle is weak, I assume the market is still in “sweep mode.”
Stop placement: “safe” doesn’t mean “wide”
This is where most people mess up.
They do one of two dumb things:
- Put the stop right at the obvious level (gets swept)
- Put the stop a mile away (RR dies, psychology dies)
The fix is not “wider stops.” It’s better entries.
A good stop is behind the level that should not be violated if your idea is correct:
- behind the FVG (case 1)
- behind the swing that forms the shift (case 2)
If your stop is placed where everyone else places theirs, don’t act surprised when it gets harvested.
Targets: where I take profit (without getting romantic)
Targets should be where liquidity is.
So I aim at:
- previous swing highs/lows
- equal highs/equal lows
- daily/session highs/lows (depending on what you trade)
If you target “random R:R” without context, you’ll take profit right before price hits the real objective.
The “don’t be delusional” part
This workflow is designed for:
- fewer “stopped out then it went my way” moments
- cleaner entries
- more confidence because you’re reacting to confirmation, not guessing
It is not designed for:
- turning $100 into $10,000 this month
- catching every move
- winning every trade
If you want a fantasy, TikTok has plenty.
My clean checklist (copy/paste)
Use this as your on-chart checklist:
| Item | Yes/No |
|---|---|
| Bias is clear (direction decided) | |
| Price is in a good area (premium/discount) | |
| Best POI marked (FVG > breaker > OB) | |
| Price tapped POI | |
| Structure shift happened on lower timeframe | |
| If no FVG: volume confirms break | |
| If no FVG: candle shows pressure | |
| Entry is on retest / trigger (not chasing) | |
| Stop is behind invalidation, not inside liquidity | |
| Target is external liquidity (not vibes) |
Bottom line
The “precise entry” isn’t one magic candle.
It’s a process:
- stop entering where the stops are
- wait for structure to tell you the reaction is real
- use FVG when it exists, and demand stronger confirmation when it doesn’t
- place stop behind invalidation, target liquidity
You’ll still lose trades. But you’ll lose fewer trades that feel like pure robbery.
And that alone is worth it.